Why a Fair Compromise Requires Deliberation

I argue in this paper that the process of compromising needs to be deliberative if a fair compromise is goal. More specifically, deliberation structurally necessary order achieve compromise. In developing argument, seeks overcome problematic dichotomy prevalent literature on democracy, which between and deliberation. This entails view preceding achievement essentially negotiating or bargaining, which, claim, should not case The reason for claim is, nutshell, negotiation bargaining processes do provide an in-depth understanding reasons each party has holding their respective position. However, other’s reasons, as will show, condition achieving contrast process, by its very structure, provides mutual therefore